A shared appreciation mortgage, also known as SAM is a type of mortgage loan, which is in the form of equity release. Borrowers are offered a capital sum, with banks getting a share of the future increase in the value of the property. Borrowers who opt for this type of mortgage are allowed to live in the house until death.
It should be noted that persons who hold a shared appreciation mortgage do not benefit from it in most cases. This is the case with mortgages which sold in the period 1996 - 1998. Then, the Bank of Scotland and Barclays targeted pensioners and sold some 11,000 SAMs, before the drastic price increases on the UK property market. Clients were allowed to borrow interest-free and up to 25 percent of their property's value. Financial institutions profited from receiving 75 percent of the increase in the property's value once it was sold.
Those who would like the idea of having a shared appreciation mortgage can check with different banks and other financial establishments in the United Kingdom, such as Cahoot, Halifax, Citibank in Britain, Cheltenham & Gloucesterk, HSBC Bank, and others. It is unlikely to be offered this type of mortgage, however, and there are good reasons for this. For example, Barclays sold shared appreciation mortgages in 1998 for a short period of time and does not offer this product anymore. The mortgage was not allowed to be transferred to another property while home prices rose dramatically. At present, persons who hold a shared appreciation mortgage face financial difficulties, which can be explained with the terms and conditions of this product. According to some, borrowers who took this type of mortgage loan did not understand the terms and conditions. At the same time, financial institutions claim that their clients were supposed to look for independent advice. Thus, it is the responsibility of the client's solicitor to make sure he or she understands the legal implications and how the scheme works.
In general, having a shared appreciation mortgage is detrimental to borrowers when property prices increase in the long term. On the opposite, clients who opted for this type of mortgage when property prices declined or remained steady have an interest-free loan, and there are no downsides. For example, if a borrower takes a 10-year mortgage, at 6 percent, in the amount of 100,000, he will save over 33,000 in mortgage payments. Yet if house prices rise, this will leave the borrower trapped in his home. This is to the disadvantage of elderly borrowers in particular. They may have to sell their house to move to an assisted living home, a nursing home, or residential care, for example. If they sell, however, this will trigger a giant payout to the bank, and funds will not be available for them to move.
Obviously, some persons like the idea of having access to cheap money. This is especially true when house price inflation is steady and relatively low. However, if property prices increase, outstanding balances do as well.
It should be noted that persons who hold a shared appreciation mortgage do not benefit from it in most cases. This is the case with mortgages which sold in the period 1996 - 1998. Then, the Bank of Scotland and Barclays targeted pensioners and sold some 11,000 SAMs, before the drastic price increases on the UK property market. Clients were allowed to borrow interest-free and up to 25 percent of their property's value. Financial institutions profited from receiving 75 percent of the increase in the property's value once it was sold.
Those who would like the idea of having a shared appreciation mortgage can check with different banks and other financial establishments in the United Kingdom, such as Cahoot, Halifax, Citibank in Britain, Cheltenham & Gloucesterk, HSBC Bank, and others. It is unlikely to be offered this type of mortgage, however, and there are good reasons for this. For example, Barclays sold shared appreciation mortgages in 1998 for a short period of time and does not offer this product anymore. The mortgage was not allowed to be transferred to another property while home prices rose dramatically. At present, persons who hold a shared appreciation mortgage face financial difficulties, which can be explained with the terms and conditions of this product. According to some, borrowers who took this type of mortgage loan did not understand the terms and conditions. At the same time, financial institutions claim that their clients were supposed to look for independent advice. Thus, it is the responsibility of the client's solicitor to make sure he or she understands the legal implications and how the scheme works.
In general, having a shared appreciation mortgage is detrimental to borrowers when property prices increase in the long term. On the opposite, clients who opted for this type of mortgage when property prices declined or remained steady have an interest-free loan, and there are no downsides. For example, if a borrower takes a 10-year mortgage, at 6 percent, in the amount of 100,000, he will save over 33,000 in mortgage payments. Yet if house prices rise, this will leave the borrower trapped in his home. This is to the disadvantage of elderly borrowers in particular. They may have to sell their house to move to an assisted living home, a nursing home, or residential care, for example. If they sell, however, this will trigger a giant payout to the bank, and funds will not be available for them to move.
Obviously, some persons like the idea of having access to cheap money. This is especially true when house price inflation is steady and relatively low. However, if property prices increase, outstanding balances do as well.
About the Author:
Finding a solid ICICI Bank UK is not easy, check if Britannia Bank is the right for choice for you.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment